Homo Erectus: The First Humans to Leave Africa

Jan 20, 2025
Homo erectus

By: Greg Schmalzel

Two million years ago, a group of humans stood up, left Africa, and changed the course of humanity forever. A population, once constrained to the confines of one continent, made their way east, toward new and unpredictable environments. This was a group of what we now call Homo erectus.

Homo erectus is known for many things. Anthropologists often consider it the first “upright man” or the first “truly human species” more generally. It is also arguably the most successful human species, having existed for approximately 2 million years. It is all of these things, but it also holds the title as the first human species to leave Africa.

But, why this species and not the earlier Homo habilis or even earlier yet Australopithecines? The human lineage had been evolving in Africa since roughly 7 million years ago. So, why wasn’t it until Homo erectus that new territories were explored? Today, we’ll be answering these questions and uncovering the secrets that set Homo erectus apart

We’ll discover what made Homo erectus so special: specifically, its suite of physical, cognitive, and social adaptations that allowed it to make such long journeys away from home. 

Who were these ancient explorers? How did they conquer vast distances? And what became of them as they ventured into the farthest reaches of the ancient world?

Let’s find out.

Watch the video version here.

Who was Homo erectus?

Geographic distribution of Homo erectus.

In 1891, Eugene Dubois, a Dutch physician turned paleoanthropologist, made a groundbreaking discovery in Indonesia. Influenced by German evolutionary biologist Ernst Haeckel’s theory that humanity originated in Asia, Dubois sought the elusive “ape-man” Haeckel had already named Pithecanthropus. This belief stemmed from perceived anatomical similarities between humans and orangutans.

Initially unsuccessful in Sumatra, Dubois shifted to Java, where bones were reportedly eroding out of the Solo River near Trinil. Excavations revealed a human molar, a skull fragment, and a femur. The skull, with its pronounced brow ridge, was unlike modern humans but larger than any non-human primate. Dubois named the specimen Pithecanthropus erectus, later nicknamed "Java Man." It marked the first discovery of Homo erectus and, at the time, the oldest known human bones.

While significant, the discovery's initial conclusion that humanity originated in Asia did not hold up. Figures like Charles Darwin had proposed Africa as the cradle of humanity, citing the close relationships between living African apes and humans. Excavations in Africa—at sites like Olduvai Gorge and Lake Turkana—uncovered older Homo erectus fossils and even earlier species like Homo habilis and Australopithecines, solidifying Africa’s primacy in human evolution.

Despite its African origins, Homo erectus is unique for its broad distribution. Fossils have been found in regions as diverse as Turkey, China, Georgia, and Germany, with “Java Man” being just one example. This wide range reflects Homo erectus' adaptability and success across varied environments. This geographic diversity led to physical variations among Homo erectus populations. Some anthropologists classify these as subspecies—e.g., Homo erectus ergaster, H. e. georgicus, and H. e. soloensis—while others view them as regional adaptations within a single species.

Despite these differences, common traits unite Homo erectus as a distinct human species, bridging the gap between earlier hominins and modern humans. These defining traits, their role in the species’ dispersal, and their legacy in Homo sapiens will be explored in the next sections.

Physical Adaptations

Illustration of Homo erectus by Mauricio Anton.

Humans engaging in extreme physical activity for non-survival reasons is a curious anomaly in nature. Homo erectus, however, relied on endurance for survival and migration, a trait evident in their physical and behavioral adaptations.

The body plan of Homo erectus was uniquely suited for long-distance travel. Unlike earlier hominins, they had longer legs than arms, a taller stature (averaging about 5’9”), and an overall physique adapted to efficient bipedal locomotion. These traits enabled them to cover significant distances with less energy, a crucial advantage when moving between distant water sources or hunting grounds. Fossilized footprints from Ileret, Kenya, dating back 1.5 million years, further support these findings. These prints reveal modern-like weight transfer, arched feet for energy-saving strides, and big toes aligned for balance and stability, highlighting their advanced adaptation to life on the ground.

Physiological adaptations played an equally critical role in enabling endurance. Features such as reduced body hair, increased sweat glands, and mouth breathing allowed Homo erectus to dissipate heat effectively during sustained exertion, reducing the risk of overheating. Though physical evidence of these traits is lacking, studies suggest that these adaptations allowed them to run for extended periods, with one estimate indicating they could run up to 5.5 hours before dehydration.

One of the most remarkable behaviors associated with Homo erectus is persistence hunting. This strategy involved running prey to exhaustion, leveraging endurance rather than speed. While prey animals were faster in short bursts, the sustained effort of Homo erectus outlasted their quarry, a method still practiced by some modern hunter-gatherers. This ability marked a turning point in human evolution, as it provided a reliable means of securing food in challenging environments.

The evolution of endurance in Homo erectus is even more striking when compared to earlier hominins like Australopithecus afarensis. Studies using running simulations for afarensis suggest their speed and endurance were significantly lower, underscoring the specialized adaptations that emerged with Homo erectus.

These physical traits enabled Homo erectus to overcome natural limitations, facilitating their migrations out of Africa and across vast territories. Combined with cognitive and cultural innovations, they laid the foundation for human dominance. In the next section, we explore the cognitive breakthroughs that defined the psyche of Homo erectus.

Cognitive Adaptations

Thoughts don’t fossilize, and neither do brains, but skulls do—and they provide a faint glimpse into the cognitive power of ancient hominins. Over time, the archaeological record reveals a pattern of increasing brain size across human evolution, punctuated by periods of rapid growth. One of these major leaps occurred with Homo erectus.

The cranial capacity of Homo erectus ranged from 725 to 1,125 cubic centimeters (cc), significantly larger than that of its predecessor, Homo habilis (507 to 690 cc). This increase brought brain sizes closer to those of modern humans. However, larger brains came at a cost: longer gestation periods, more difficult childbirths, prolonged infant dependency, and a high metabolic demand. Despite these challenges, evolutionary advantages—likely tied to survival and adaptation—outweighed the costs.

Bigger brains brought increased capacity for advanced thinking. Regions like the prefrontal cortex and neocortex expanded more significantly, enhancing decision-making, problem-solving, social cognition, and creativity. These developments supported innovations like tool use, navigation, and adaptability to diverse environments, paving the way for Homo erectus migrations out of Africa.

Interestingly, dopamine—a neurochemical tied to motivation, reward, and novelty-seeking—may have played a role. Increased meat consumption and physical activity associated with persistence hunting might have amplified dopamine levels, fostering goal-driven behavior and curiosity. This could explain Homo erectus’ motivation to explore uncharted territories.

The evolutionary leap in brain size marked just one facet of Homo erectus’ transformation. Their tools, social structures, and adaptability also played a crucial role in their success—topics explored in the next section. For a deeper dive into the evolution of the human brain, check out my video on the matter here.

Social and Cultural Adaptations

Acheulean Tools


By the time of Homo erectus, humans had become obligate tool users, leveraging tools to cement their apex predator status. Emerging during the Lower Paleolithic (3.3 million to 300,000 years ago), their tools mark a significant cognitive leap. While earlier Oldowan tools consisted of crude, single-edged cobbles, Homo erectus refined these into symmetrical Acheulean handaxes through bifacial flaking. This innovation demanded advanced cognitive abilities like planning, visio-spatial coordination, and even aesthetic appreciation, setting them apart from earlier toolmakers. Evidence from sites like Boxgrove in England highlights how these tools were used for butchery and food processing, showcasing the synergy between brainpower and technological advancement.

Mastering Fire

Illustration by Maurice Wilson.

Another transformative adaptation of Homo erectus was their mastery of fire—arguably one of humanity’s most critical innovations. Fire provided protection, warmth, and the ability to cook food, unlocking greater caloric energy and reducing digestive effort. These advantages fueled brain growth, aligning with Richard Wrangham’s theory linking dietary advancements to evolutionary leaps in brain size. Beyond sustenance, fire fostered social interactions, from communal meals to storytelling, paving the way for complex communication and cooperation.

Social Dynamics and Cooperation


Diego Rodríguez Robredo

The social structures of Homo erectus likely laid the foundation for human community as we know it. Evidence from 1.5-million-year-old footprints suggests groups included multiple males and females, hinting at cooperative dynamics rather than constant competition. Shared responsibilities like food gathering and child-rearing strengthened group cohesion and ensured survival. Cooperative breeding—where group members supported childcare—allowed juveniles to thrive and learn essential skills, passing knowledge across generations.

Conclusion

These physical, cognitive, and social adaptations made Homo erectus the longest-lived human species, thriving for nearly 2 million years. The question remains: will modern humans match their endurance, or will our advancements lead to our downfall?

Sources: 

[1] Larsen, Clark Spencer. 2019. Essentials of Biological Anthropology. 4th ed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

[2] Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man, and Selection in relation to sex. John Murray.

[3] Antón, S. 2003. “Natural history of Homo erectus.” Am J Phys Anthropol. 37:126-70.

[4] McHenry, H., and Coffing, K. 2000. “Australopithecus to Homo: Transformations in Body and Mind.” Annual Review of Anthropology 29:125-146.

[5] Hatala, K., et al. 2016. “Footprints reveal direct evidence of group behavior and locomotion in Homo erectus.” Sci Rep 6, 28766.

[6] Bramble, D. and Lieberman, D. 2004. “Endurance running and the evolution of Homo.” Nature 432:345–352.

[7] Hora, M., et al. 2020. “Dehydration and persistence hunting in Homo erectus.” Journal of Human Evolution 138,1-21. 

[8] Bates, K., et al. 2025. “Running performance in Australopithecus afarensis.” Curr Biol 35(1):224-230.e4.

[9] Liebenberg, L. 2006. “Persistence Hunting by Modern Hunter‐Gatherers.” Current Anthropology 47(6):1017-1026.

[10] Lieberman, D. 2011. The Evolution of the Human Head. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

[11] Schoenemann, P. Thomas. 2006. “Evolution of the Size and Functional Areas of the Human Brain.” Annual Review of Anthropology 35:379-406.

[12] ​Dunbar, R. I. M. 2003. "THE SOCIAL BRAIN: Mind, Language, and Society in Evolutionary Perspective." Annual Review of Anthropology 32(1):163-181. 

  • (and other works by Robin Dunbar) 

[13] Previc, F.H., 2009. The Dopaminergic Mind in Human Evolution and History.

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

[14] DeLouize, A., et al. 2017. “Dopaminergic systems expansion and the advent of Homo erectus.” Quaternary International 427, 245-252.

[15] Diez-Martín, f., et al. 2019. “A faltering origin for the Acheulean? Technological and cognitive implications from FLK West (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania).” Quaternary International 526, 49-66.

[16] Putt, S., et al. 2017. “The functional brain networks that underlie Early Stone Age tool manufacture.” Nat Hum Behav 1, 0102.

[17] Pope, M., et al. 2020. “The Horse Butchery Site GTP17: A high-resolution record of Lower Palaeolithic hominin behaviour at Boxgrove, UK.” SpoilHeap Publications.

[18] Yravedra, J., et al. 2020. “Mammal butchery by Homo erectus at the Lower Pleistocene acheulean site of Juma’s korongo 2 (JK2), bed III, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.” Quaternary Science Reviews 249, 106612.

[19] Mosquera, M., et al. 2015. “Barranc de La Boella (Catalonia, Spain): An Acheulean Elephant Butchering Site from the European Late Early Pleistocene.” Journal of Quaternary Science 30(7):651–66

[20] Wrangham, Richard W. 2009. Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human. New York, NY: Basic Books

[21] Berna, F., et al. 2012. “Microstratigraphic evidence of in situ fire in the Acheulean strata of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa.” PNAS 109(20):E1215–E1220.

[22] Wiessner, Polly. 2014. “Embers of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/'hoansi Bushmen.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(39):14027-14035.

[23] Vaesen, K. 2012. “Cooperative feeding and breeding, and the evolution of executive control.” Biol Philos 27(1):115-124.

SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE