Everything We Know About the Clovis Culture - Ancient Americans

By: Greg Schmalzel

Imagine uncovering a stone tool that’s been buried for over 13,000 years. Who crafted it, how did they do it, and for what purpose? Today, we’ll be exploring these tools and their creators. We’re diving into what life was like from within the Clovis culture - the mysterious people who left their mark across an entire continent. Their tools, DNA, and untold stories are hidden beneath the topsoil of North America.

There are many mysteries in the world of archaeology - it's a defining feature of the field and largely why hobbyists and professionals are drawn to it. From cleaning the dirt off ancient human skeletons to exploring underwater Viking shipwrecks, the questions calling for answers are endless. That being, the questions concerning the Clovis culture are particularly compelling and controversial. 

This has been a significant area of research for almost 100 years, and in this video, I’ll be sharing with you everything we’ve learned. It will undoubtedly open your eyes to the fascinating lives of some of America’s earliest pioneers. You will also learn how much we don’t know about this vanished culture and what future research can still teach us. 

If you'd prefer the video format of this article, click here.

If not, let’s start our journey from the beginning, in a small town in New Mexico.

The Discovery and History of Clovis                                 

In 1929, a 19-year-old named Ridgley Whiteman made a discovery that would change our understanding of North America's ancient past. Whiteman, an amateur archaeologist with a passion for early human history, was exploring a dried-up stream bed called Blackwater Draw near Clovis, New Mexico. Guided by his knowledge of local finds, including Folsom projectile points associated with extinct bison, he recognized something extraordinary: a distinctive stone point with a fluted base, now known as a Clovis point.

Ridgely Whiteman, 1929.

This find drew professional archaeologists to Blackwater Draw, where they uncovered more tools alongside the remains of Ice Age megafauna like mammoths and bison. These points, remarkable for their fluted design and advanced craftsmanship, demonstrated that Clovis technology was a hallmark of early human innovation. Excavations revealed that these tools, over 13,000 years old, were used by some of North America's first widespread groups to hunt large game.

The discovery of Clovis points sparked decades of research and led to the identification of similar sites across the continent. These artifacts provided a glimpse into the lives of Ice Age people who adapted to diverse Pleistocene landscapes, challenging earlier theories about the timing and nature of human migrations into the Americas.

So let’s take a closer look at these diagnostic artifacts, how they were made, and what they were used for.

Clovis Tools and Technology                                 

Clovis technology wasn’t the hallmark of a single, unified culture. Rather, it represented shared tools and techniques among diverse Paleoindian groups. Much like today’s global use of smartphones doesn’t define a singular culture, Clovis points reflect a technological trend rather than a cohesive identity. When referring to “Clovis culture,” we’re speaking about those ancient Americans who used these distinct artifacts.

Dating and Distribution

Radiocarbon dating places Clovis points between 13,050 and 12,700 years ago, a remarkably tight timeframe for such widespread use. These tools have been found across the Americas, from Canada to South America, with the densest clusters in the eastern United States. Contrary to common belief, Clovis technology wasn’t solely a Western Plains phenomenon—it was a truly American invention. Notably, these points are unique to the Americas, raising questions about their origins and predecessors.

Clovis Points: Form and Function

The defining feature of Clovis points is their flute—a grooved channel extending partway from the base toward the tip. This design likely improved hafting onto spear shafts and enhanced shock absorption. Typically lanceolate (leaf-shaped), Clovis points were crafted for aerodynamic efficiency, making them versatile tools for hunting and other tasks. Their bifacial design, achieved through careful percussion and pressure flaking, demonstrates advanced craftsmanship.

Clovis Points.

Multi-Use Tools: Hunting and Butchering

Clovis points were likely multi-functional. While often associated with hunting large game—including now-extinct megafauna like mammoths and North American camels—experiments suggest they were also efficient for butchering. Tests show fluted points processed meat faster than unfluted flakes, hinting at their practicality for a range of activities.

Materials of Choice

Clovis artisans primarily worked with cryptocrystalline rocks like chert, flint, and jasper. These materials, known for their predictable fracturing properties, were sourced locally or traded over vast distances. Sites like Plenge in New Jersey reveal a blend of local and distant stones, with early tools showing more nonlocal materials—perhaps evidence of evolving territorial familiarity.

Beyond Stone: Organic and Animal Materials

While organic tools like wooden shafts and sinew bindings have decayed over time, bone and ivory artifacts provide a glimpse into Clovis ingenuity. Sites like Blackwater Draw and Murray Springs have yielded mammoth tusks and unique bone tools, showcasing the adaptability of these early Americans.

Clovis technology demonstrates a resourceful approach to toolmaking, reflecting the needs of a mobile, skilled population. These tools are only one piece of the puzzle—understanding their daily lives and rituals provides a fuller picture of their culture. In the next section, we’ll explore their movements, behaviors, and traditions.

What Was Clovis Culture Like?                                 

Clovis people embodied the nomadic lifestyles of early Americans. Unlike the later agricultural societies of Caral-Supe, the Olmecs, or Ancestral Puebloans, Clovis groups had no permanent settlements. This is largely due to the absence of agriculture. They relied entirely on hunting and gathering, carrying lightweight toolkits and following seasonal patterns of wild plants and animals. Their campsites were temporary, often using natural rockshelters or simple hearths for cooking and social activities.

Socially, Clovis groups were likely small and egalitarian, with minimal stratification. While specific roles for men and women remain speculative, studies on modern foragers suggest that both sexes contributed to hunting and gathering. This challenges older ideas of strict gender divisions, especially with tools like atlatls, which equalized physical differences in hunting capabilities. Though not direct evidence, we can hypothesize that Clovis groups were similarly egalitarian. 

Illustration by Martin Pate.

Rituals and Symbolism

Evidence of ritualistic behavior among Clovis groups comes primarily from their use of red ochre and the craftsmanship of their tools. Red ochre, a pigment with spiritual or ceremonial significance, has been found in hunting sites, caches, and even burials. A prime example is the Powars II site in Wyoming, the oldest known red ochre quarry in North America. Radiocarbon dates suggest Clovis-related activities occured here about 12,850 years ago.

Clovis points themselves, with their symmetry and craftsmanship, may have held artistic or symbolic value. Some were found coated with red ochre in caches like the Fenn cache and the East Wenatchee cache, suggesting ceremonial intent.

The only known Clovis burial site, the Anzick Site in Montana, provides direct evidence of Clovis ritual and offers genetic insights. This burial contained a young child interred with red ochre and over 100 stone and bone tools. It remains the only known Clovis burial, emphasizing the rarity of such finds and hinting at a spiritual or symbolic dimension to their culture.

Through art, tools, and burial practices, the Clovis people demonstrated complex cultural behaviors, though much about their social lives and beliefs remains shrouded in mystery.

The Anzick Site and Clovis Genetics                                 

In 1968, near Wilsall, Montana, construction worker Ben Hargis stumbled upon an extraordinary archaeological find while clearing sandstone for roadwork. Beneath the rubble lay a treasure trove of ancient artifacts, including projectile points, chert bifaces, tools, and osseous implements—all coated with red ocher. Among these, the partial remains of two juveniles were uncovered: an infant boy (Anzick-1) and another child (Anzick-2), aged 6 to 8.

Although the amateur excavation methods disrupted stratigraphic integrity, the site, located on the Anzick family’s property, is now recognized as one of the most significant Clovis-era ceremonial burials. Later radiocarbon analyses dated Anzick-1’s ocher-covered remains to approximately 12,700 years ago, firmly placing them within the Clovis period.

Clovis Genetics and Cultural Continuity

The groundbreaking work of Sarah Anzick, a geneticist with a personal connection to the site, further illuminated the importance of the discovery. In 2014, Sarah and her team sequenced the genome of Anzick-1. Their findings established a genetic link between this Clovis individual and modern Indigenous peoples, particularly those in Central and South America. This confirmed a genetic continuity from the Clovis culture to later Native American populations, debunking theories of complete cultural replacement.

Illustration by G. Mulzel.

Anzick-1’s DNA also showed ties to a 24,000-year-old individual from Siberia, supporting the theory that Native Americans descended from populations in northeastern Asia who migrated via the Bering Land Bridge.

The reburial of Anzick-1 near the original discovery site reflects a blend of cultural reverence and scientific legacy. His remains, paired with the tools and red ocher, offer invaluable insight into Clovis lifeways, rituals, and genetic ancestry.

Interestingly, genetic research on ancient dog DNA aligns with these human migration patterns. An ancient, domesticated dog bone found in Alaska revealed ties to Siberian ancestors, indicating dogs accompanied early Paleoindians into the Americas around 16,700 years ago.

Though these genetic studies provide a wealth of information, the origins and migration stories of the Clovis people remain a complex puzzle—one scientists continue to piece together.

Where Did Clovis People Come From?                                 

Understanding where the Clovis people came from involves two perspectives: their geographical origins and the origins of their technology. These perspectives are interconnected, offering a fuller picture of the Clovis story.

Historically, discussions about the arrival of Clovis people often overlapped with broader debates about the first migrations into the Americas. However, it's now clear that people were present in the Americas before Clovis. The two most prominent migration theories are the interior route hypothesis and the coastal migration hypothesis.

The interior route hypothesis suggests that people crossed Beringia, a now-submerged land bridge between Asia and North America, during periods of lower sea levels towars the end of the Pleistocene. They traveled through an "ice-free corridor" that opened between massive glaciers around 14,000 years ago.

The coastal migration hypothesis proposes that early groups used boats to travel along the Pacific coast, supported by resources like kelp forests and marine animals. Archaeological evidence increasingly favors this route, as coastal conditions during the Last Glacial Maximum (around 18,000–24,000 years ago) would have facilitated such journeys, allowing them to bypass the glaciers entirely.

Image showing interior route. The coastal migration would've followed the west coast instead.

The Origins of Clovis Technology

The Clovis Point—a hallmark of Clovis culture—has been linked to three potential technological relatives: Solutrean Points, Fishtail Points, and Western Stemmed Points.

• Solutrean Points: These Paleolithic European tools bear some resemblance to Clovis Points but lack the distinctive fluting. The Solutrean Hypothesis, which suggests Clovis technology evolved from Solutrean, is widely disputed due to gaps in evidence and lack of genetic connections.
• Fishtail Points: Found across South America, these points appear around the same time as Clovis Points. Some early examples feature fluted bases, suggesting a possible shared ancestry or adaptation of Clovis technology.
• Western Stemmed Points: These tools, with distinctive contracting stems, are contemporaneous with Clovis and some even predate them. Finds like those at Cooper’s Ferry in Idaho, dated to 16,500 years ago, support a coastal migration route and highlight technological diversity in early America.

While there is no direct evidence that any of these gave rise to Clovis points, the discoveries at Cooper’s Ferry dated to around 16,500 years ago, provide compelling evidence that a distinct human culture was present in the Americas well before Clovis emerged. This challenges the idea that Clovis people were the continent's first inhabitants. However, it does not diminish the uniqueness of Clovis technology, which is distinctly North American in origin.

Western Stemmed Points, found in sites like Cooper’s Ferry, share remarkable similarities with tools from East Asia, particularly in Japan and Korea, dating back 30,000 to 16,000 years ago. This connection suggests a broader circum-Pacific technological tradition, where stemmed points may have evolved in Asia and then influenced—or shared a common origin with—those in the Americas. The resemblance between these tools highlights the continuity and exchange of ideas across vast regions during the Pleistocene.

The Clovis Point, however, is entirely unique to the Americas and stands out within what archaeologists call the American fluted technocomplex. This innovation demonstrates a technological leap that emerged independently on the North American continent.

Why Clovis technology arose remains a mystery, though many researchers suggest it was an adaptation for hunting the megafauna of Pleistocene North America, such as mammoths and mastodons. The irony is that this highly effective technology may have contributed to the overhunting of these animals, accelerating their extinction and leaving Clovis groups without their primary food sources—a factor that could have contributed to the culture's rapid decline.

This interplay between innovation, adaptation, and environmental consequences provides a fascinating lens through which to examine the rise and fall of the Clovis culture. In fact, its sudden disappearance marks a significant turning point in early American history, hinting at ecological, human-driven, and possibly extra-terrestrial factors.

The Mysterious Disappearance of the Clovis Culture                                 

The Clovis culture appears to have disappeared around 12,700 years ago. This sudden disappearance has puzzled researchers, and several theories attempt to explain why such a widespread and influential culture came to an end. Some of the most prominent ideas include the Overkill Hypothesis, climate change, and the controversial Younger Dryas impact hypothesis.

The Overkill Hypothesis

One early theory is the Overkill Hypothesis, proposed by Paul Martin in the 1960s. This suggests that Clovis people, armed with advanced hunting tools, may have hunted North America’s megafauna to extinction. Evidence from kill sites, where Clovis points were found alongside megafaunal remains, supports the idea that these large animals were a critical resource for the Clovis people.

Clovis group hunting a mammoth with atlatls.

However, some researchers argue that the evidence of human involvement in megafaunal extinction is not sufficient to explain the widespread die-off. Archaeologist David Meltzer points out that the number of kill sites is minimal, and the majority of the animals Clovis people hunted were not among the extinct megafauna. Other studies show that Clovis groups may have engaged in opportunistic hunting, rather than focusing exclusively on large game. This raises the possibility that factors other than human overhunting contributed to the extinction of these massive animals.

So if not people, what else could explain the extinction of the megafauna? And could it also explain the disappearance of the Clovis culture?

Climate Change and the Younger Dryas

As the Earth transitioned from the cold Pleistocene to the warmer Holocene, dramatic climate shifts occurred. Between 15,000 and 10,000 years ago, global temperatures rose significantly, which likely caused stress to cold-adapted megafauna. This warming could have led to resource scarcity for both humans and animals. Evidence suggests that many megafauna were already in decline before Clovis people arrived, with some species already extinct by the time of their presence.

The Younger Dryas, a period of abrupt and extreme cooling starting around 12,900 years ago, exacerbated this climate instability. Some claim that this was caused by global changes in ocean currents and others speculate that and comet hitting the earth triggered it. Regardless of the impetus, this event disrupted ecosystems, reduced vegetation, and placed additional stress on both megafauna and human populations. The Clovis people were likely forced to adapt their hunting strategies or move to areas with more stable resources. The Younger Dryas may have triggered significant cultural shifts, as some studies suggest a population bottleneck and reorganization of Clovis groups in response to these climatic changes. Instead of disappearing completely, the Clovis culture likely evolved into new cultural traditions, like Folsom, better suited to the changing environment.

The End of Clovis: A Combination of Factors

While the Overkill and climate change hypotheses offer valuable insights, it's likely that the end of the Clovis culture was a result of a combination of factors. Overhunting, ecological disruptions caused by climate change, and possibly catastrophic events like the Younger Dryas cooling event created a "perfect storm" that led to the collapse of the Clovis way of life. As a result, Clovis groups may have either vanished or adapted into distinct regional cultures that were better suited to the new environmental challenges they faced.

Despite the disappearance of Clovis culture, its legacy endured. The diverse cultural traditions that followed, including the Folsom culture, are a testament to the adaptability and resilience of humans during one of the most challenging periods in prehistory. While we may never fully understand the reasons behind Clovis’ decline, ongoing research will continue to shed light on this fascinating chapter of human history.

A Broader View of Early Americas

The Clovis people weren’t the only ones shaping the Americas during this period. While they were primarily based in North America, distinct cultures existed in South America. To explore the earliest inhabitants of South America and their artifacts, check out my video on The OLDEST Artifacts in South America. For even more insights from Evolve.2, be sure to sign up for my free newsletter—link below. Thanks for watching, and I’ll see you in the next article!

Sources:

[1] “James Ridgley Whiteman, 1910 - 2003.” 2004. Plains Anthropologist 49(189):85-90.

[2] Waters, M., et al. 2020. “The age of Clovis-13,050 to 12,750 cal yr B.P.” Science Advances 6(43):eaaz0455.

[3] Pearson, G. 2002. “Pan-continental Paleoindian expansions and interactions as viewed from the earliest lithic industries of lower Central America.” Thesis (Ph.D)-University of Kansas. (Figure 68)

[4] Thomas, K., et al. 2017. “Explaining the origin of fluting in North American Pleistocene weaponry.” Journal of Archaeological Science 81:23-30.

[5] Grayson, D., and Meltzer, D. 2015. “Revisiting Paleoindian exploitation of extinct North American mammals.” Journal of Archaeological Science 56:177-193.

[6] Byram, R., et al. 2024. “Clovis points and foreshafts under braced weapon compression: Modeling Pleistocene megafauna encounters with a lithic pike.” PLoS One 19(8):e0307996.

[7] Eren, M., et al. 2024. “Experimental bison butchery using replica hafted Clovis fluted points and large handheld flakes.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 55:104480.

[8] Gingerich, J. 2013. “Fifty Years of Discovery at Plenge.” Chapter From: In the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition, edited by Joseph A.M. Gingerich pp. 121- 147. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake. 

[9] Bradley, B. 1995. CLOVIS IVORY AND BONE TOOLS.

[10] Gintis, H., et al. 2019. “Zoon politikon: The evolutionary origins of human socio-political systems.” Behav Processes 161:17-30.

[11] Anderson, A., et al. 2023. “The Myth of Man the Hunter: Women’s contribution to the hunt across ethnographic contexts.” PLoS ONE 18(6):e0287101.

[12] Bebber, M.,et al. 2023. “Atlatl use equalizes female and male projectile weapon velocity.” Sci Rep 13:13349. 

[13] Sutton, M. 2021. “Envisioning a Western Clovis Ritual Complex.” PaleoAmerica 7(1):1-32

[14] Frison, G., et al. 2018. “Further Insights into Paleoindian use of the Powars II Red Ocher Quarry (48PL330), Wyoming.” American Antiquity 83(3):485-504.

[15] Pelton, S., et al. 2022. “In situ evidence for Paleoindian hematite quarrying at the Powars II site (48PL330), Wyoming.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119(20):e2201005119,

[16] Kilby, J.D., 2008. “An Investigation of Clovis Caches: Content, Function, and Technological Organization.” University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation).

[17] Bebber, M. R. 2023. “Principles of Modern Artistic Design in Late Pleistocene Clovis Stone Biface Technology.” Lithic Technology, 49(2):113–132.

[18] Taylor, D. C. 1969. “The Wilsall Excavations: An Exercise in Frustration.” Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences 29:147-150.

[19] Owsley, D., et al. 2001. “Clovis and Early Archaic Crania from the Anzick Site (24PA506), Park County, Montana.” Plains Anthropologist 46:115-124.

[20] Becerra-Valdivia, L. et al. 2018. “Reassessing the chronology of the archaeological site of Anzick.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115(27):7000-7003.

[21] Rasmussen, M., et al. 2014. “The genome of a Late Pleistocene human from a Clovis burial site in western Montana.” Nature 506:225–229.

[22] Royer, T.C., and Finney, B. 2020. “An oceanographic perspective on early human migrations to the Americas.” Oceanography 33(1):32–41.

[23] Erlandson, J. M., et al. 2007. “The Kelp Highway Hypothesis: Marine Ecology, the Coastal Migration Theory, and the Peopling of the Americas.” The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 2(2):161–174.

[24] Bradley, B., and Stanford, D. 2004. “The North Atlantic ice-edge corridor: a possible Palaeolithic route to the New World.” World Archaeology 36(4).

[25] Perrot-Minnot, S. 2012. “The Clovis and Fishtail Traditions in Central America.” Anales de la Academia de Geografía e Historia de Guatemala, LXXXVII:181-212.

[26] Smith, G., et al. 2019. “The Western Stemmed Tradition: Problems and Prospects in Paleoindian Archaeology in the Intermountain West.” PaleoAmerica 6(1):23–42.

[27] Davis, L., et al. 2019. “Late Upper Paleolithic occupation at Cooper's Ferry, Idaho, USA, ~16,000 years ago.” Science 365(6456):891-897.

[28] Pratt, J., et al. (2019). “A Circum-Pacific Perspective on the Origin of Stemmed Points in North America.” PaleoAmerica 6(1):64–108.

[29] Waguespack, N. M., and Surovell, T. A. 2003. “Clovis Hunting Strategies, or How to Make out on Plentiful Resources.” American Antiquity, 68(2):333–352.

[30] Frison, G. 1989. “Experimental Use of Clovis Weaponry and Tools on African Elephants.” American Antiquity 54(4):766-784.

[31] Meltzer, D. 2020. “Overkill, glacial history, and the extinction of North America’s Ice Age megafauna.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117(46):28555-28563.

[32] Nash, B., et al. 2024. “Clovis organizational dynamics at a Late Glacial campsite in the central Great Lakes: Belson site excavations 2020–2021.” PLoS ONE 19(5):e0302255..

[33] Berger, A., and Loutre, M. 1991. “Insolation values for the climate of the last 10 million years.” Quat. Sci. Rev. 10:297–317.

[34] Meltzer, D. 2015. “Pleistocene Overkill and North American Mammalian Extinctions.” Annual Review of Anthropology 44:33-53.

[35] da Silva Coelho, F., et al. 2021. “An early dog from southeast Alaska supports a coastal route for the first dog migration into the Americas.” Proc Biol Sci. 288(1945):20203103. 

[36] Anderson, D. et al. 2011. “Multiple lines of evidence for possible Human population decline/settlement reorganization during the early Younger Dryas.” Quaternary International 242(2):570-583.

[37] Buchanan, B., et al. 2022. “Bayesian Modeling of the Clovis and Folsom Radiocarbon Records Indicates a 200-Year Multigenerational Transition.” American Antiquity 86(3).